<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/project/2820</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /project/2820</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/2820</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/2820</link>
<title>Peer Review and Evaluation</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3419</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3419</link>
<title>Anonymous Source Is Not the Same as Open Source - NYT Wikipedia editorial</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/4428</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/4428</link>
<title>I Want My Wikipedia!</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3129</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3129</link>
<title>Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers : Nature</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2823</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2823</link>
<title>Nature Article Compares Britannica and Wikipedia for Accuracy</title>
<description>&lt;!--StartFragment --&gt;&lt;a title="Nature article" href="http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1038/438900a"&gt;http://dx.doi.org/&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="blacksml"&gt;10.1038/438900a&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2824</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2824</link>
<title>Peer Review Guide from Sense About Science</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2821</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2821</link>
<title>Rediscovering Willis</title>
<description>Article about the inadvertent repetition of research&lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2827</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2827</link>
<title>Student research and the internet</title>
<description>Communications of the ACM article.&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--StartFragment --&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101779.1101802"&gt;http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101779.1101802&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2996</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2996</link>
<title>The Scientist : Detecting fraud at journals</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2822</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2822</link>
<title>The Scientist : Is Peer Review Broken?</title>
<description/></item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3144</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3144</link>
<title>The invisible hand of peer review</title>
<description/></item>
</channel>
</rss>
