<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/congestion_pricing</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/congestion_pricing</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/30412</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/30412</link>
<title>Latest Plan for Corzine to Consider - Private Lanes on the Turnpike - NYTimes.com</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Latest Plan for Corzine to Consider: Private Lanes on the Turnpike&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By NATE SCHWEBER&lt;br /&gt;Published: July 9, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, Gov. Jon S. Corzine all but offered to lease the New Jersey Turnpike to the highest bidder. Then he floated the bizarre bureaucratic notion of creating a public benefit corporation so the taxpaying public could, essentially, become a private entity and operate the turnpike and other highways (which are now run by a different quasi-public agency).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He proposed an 800 percent toll increase to pay for the state's aging roads and draw down half of its more than $30 billion in debt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, after all those ideas have been shot down, Mr. Corzine is considering a new prospect for financing critical infrastructure and reducing congestion on the road: Privatize individual lanes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"It does make you wonder what's next," said Jon Shure, president of New Jersey Policy Perspective, a nonprofit research organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Monday, the State Senate president, Richard J. Codey, a Democrat of Essex County, unveiled his proposal for a private company to build an extension on the turnpike from Exit 8A to Exit 6 and on the Garden State Parkway from Exit 82 down to an exit in the 30s for drivers willing to pay extra to avoid traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the same time, State Senator Raymond J. Lesniak, a Democrat from Union County who is chairman of the Economic Growth Committee, offered his own twist, suggesting that the new lanes be reserved for buses and trucks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/22958</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/22958</link>
<title>NYC Car Commuters Are Wealthier and Cops All Drive to Work, StreetsBlog, November 12, 2007</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font face="verdana,arial,helvetica" size="3"&gt;NYC Car Commuters Are Wealthier and Cops All Drive to Work&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Verdana,arial,helvetica" size="2"&gt; Motorists are &amp;quot;twice as likely as other congestion zone commuters to hold government jobs&amp;quot; -- 19.5 percent versus 10.3 percent. About a quarter of these government motor vehicle users work in the police or fire departments. &amp;quot;Indeed, very few congestion zone commuters in these occupations took other forms of transportation,&amp;quot; according to IBO. Educators represented another one-fourth of government employee car commuters, &amp;quot;although many other educators used alternative transportation.&amp;quot;&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/22146</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/22146</link>
<title>Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? By: Ewing, Reid</title>
<description>&lt;dl class="short-citation"&gt;&lt;dt class="medium-bold"&gt;Title: &lt;/dt&gt;&lt;dd class="medium-normal"&gt;Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?&lt;span class="updated-short-citation"&gt; By: Ewing, Reid, Journal of the American Planning Association, 01944363, Winter97,  Vol. 63,  Issue 1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt class="medium-bold"&gt;Database: &lt;/dt&gt;&lt;dd class="medium-normal"&gt;Academic Search Premier&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dd class="medium-normal"&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Abstract:&lt;/dt&gt;&lt;dd&gt;Focuses on the characteristics, causes and costs of compact development. Distinction from high density or monocentric development; Indications of poor accessibility and lack of functional open space; Market-related causes; Result of market failure; Consumer preference on compact centers; Energy consumption and air pollution; Infrastructure and public service costs; Impact on cities and downtowns.&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dd class="medium-normal"&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;....&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cures&lt;/em&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The only policy intervention endorsed by G &amp;amp; R is the imposition of congestion charges and emissions fees as shadow prices for external costs of auto use, specifically for delay and air pollution imposed on others. This is a safe endorsement for sprawl lovers. While congestion pricing and emissions fees have been touted by economists for decades, those in political power have not exactly rushed to meter their constituents' travel (Orski 1992; Arrillaga 1993).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The first federal demonstration program on congestion pricing, 1973-1978, produced no demonstrations. The current Congestion Pricing Pilot Program, started five years ago, has produced one limited pilot project (and many planning studies) (FHA 1996). Millions of dollars of spending authority were recently rescinded. Most candidates for future congestion pricing are individual bridges or expressways that already charge tolls, but would charge a premium at peak hours. Areawide congestion pricing is a good idea whose time has apparently not come. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/21970</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/21970</link>
<title>Cars out as London mayor clears way for Paris-style plage and cycle boulevards - Times Online</title>
<description>November 15, 2007&lt;br /&gt;Cars out as London mayor clears way for Paris-style plage and cycle boulevards&lt;br /&gt;Visitors to London may not find the streets paved with gold but they could certainly find that a lot more streets have been paved, under proposals for the tourist heart of the capital.&lt;br /&gt;Cars will be banned from some of London's busiest streets as part of a bold plan to create continental-style boulevards devoted to pedestrians and cyclists.&lt;br /&gt;Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, plans to replicate Paris Plage, the beach created on a highway alongside the Seine each August, on the four-lane Victoria Embankment beside the Thames.&lt;br /&gt;He is also considering a ban on through traffic on a series of roads connecting London's parks and main shopping areas, including Portland Place, which runs between Regent's Park and Oxford Street.&lt;br /&gt;Speaking at Mayor's Question Time at the London Assembly yesterday, Mr Livingstone said that he wanted to create attractive, tree-lined walkways in the style of Las Ramblas in Barcelona. Traffic would be diverted on to alternative routes, but shops and restaurants would still be able to receive deliveries outside peak hours.&lt;br /&gt;The first scheme will be the &amp;pound;18 million part-pedestrianisation of Parliament Square, which will involve removing traffic from the south side closest to Westminster Abbey from 2009. Mr Livingstone believes that the success of the Trafalgar Square scheme, where the road beside the National Gallery has been pedestrianised, will help to overcome objections by motoring groups and retailers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The RAC Foundation said that Mr Livingstone's plan would force traffic on to less suitable routes and add to congestion, which is already almost back to the level before congestion charging began in 2003. &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20779</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20779</link>
<title>I-80 toll plans moving forward | Philadelphia Inquirer | 10/17/2007</title>
<description>&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 				 										&lt;div class="article_timestamp"&gt; 						 						Posted on Wed, Oct. 17, 2007 					&lt;/div&gt; 					&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 				 				   &lt;!-- startclickprintinclude --&gt;				 												&lt;h1&gt;I-80 toll plans moving forward&lt;/h1&gt; 								&lt;p class="byline"&gt;By Paul Nussbaum&lt;/p&gt; 				&lt;p class="byline lastline"&gt;Inquirer Staff Writer&lt;/p&gt; 			 			 The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission will take over operation of I-80 and turn the freeway into a toll road under terms of a 50-year lease signed late Monday.&lt;p&gt; The lease with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation was signed just before a midnight deadline set by the legislature. Tolls could be in place by 2010 if permission is obtained from the Federal Highway Administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The state's two highway agencies made formal application for that approval on Saturday. In the application, the turnpike agency said it planned to double the money available for I-80 repairs and upgrades over the next decade to $2 billion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The state's plan envisions as many as 10 toll booths between New Jersey and Ohio, with an initial cost of about $25 for motorists to drive the entire 311-mile highway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The I-80 tolls would be set at the turnpike's rate, which is anticipated to be about 8 cents per mile in three years, for cars. That would represent a 33 percent increase from the current turnpike toll rate, which now averages about 6 cents per mile. (Tolls would be 23 cents per mile for trucks weighing 30,001 to 45,000 pounds.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Tolls on I-80 are part of a plan created last July by the legislature to raise about $965 million more per year over the next 10 years for highways, bridges and mass transit. The new law, Act 44, has been under fire from northern Pennsylvanians along the I-80 corridor who fear it will hurt the economy of the region.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20774</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20774</link>
<title>ScienceDirect - Transport Policy : Congestion pricing's conditional promise: promotion of accessibility or mobility?</title>
<description>&lt;div class="citation"&gt;                                      &lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;Title: Congestion pricing's conditional promise: promotion of accessibility or mobility?&lt;/div&gt;          &lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;         Source:                               Transport Policy                                           [0967-070X]                                           Levine                                           yr:2002                                           vol:9                                           iss:3                                           pg:179                               &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="h3"&gt;Abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The derived nature of transportation demand implies that enhancement of mobility per se is not a reasonable goal for transportation policy; instead, improved mobility is desired to the extent that it furthers accessibility&amp;mdash;a goal that can be achieved through a variety of measures. The paper uses the mobility&amp;ndash;accessibility distinction to distinguish different implementations of congestion pricing. A mobility-based congestion pricing promises to alleviate congestion but threatens to deteriorate from overall regional accessibility as it accelerates metropolitan deconcentration. In contrast, accessibility-based congestion pricing avoids acceleration of sprawl by incorporating policies to ensure that drivers tolled off roads are replaced with residents and travelers arriving at previously congested areas by other means. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;                     &lt;/div&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20471</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20471</link>
<title>Massachusetts considers charging by the mile for highway drivers - The Boston Globe</title>
<description>The Boston Globe&lt;br /&gt;Tolling the open road&lt;br /&gt;Massachusetts considers charging by the mile for highway drivers&lt;br /&gt;By Noah Bierman, Globe Staff  |  October 7, 2007&lt;p&gt;The monthly invoice could look something like an electricity bill or a cellphone statement. But instead of kilowatt hours or roaming minutes, it would itemize how many miles you drive - with surcharges for traveling during peak hours, premiums for using so-called Lexus lanes that bypass rush-hour snarls, and discounts for sitting through traffic jams.&lt;br /&gt;The free and open road, regarded by many Americans as a birthright, could become a relic under a plan being discussed in Massachusetts and in several other states, transforming highway use from a service available to all into a utility paid for on a per-mile basis.&lt;br /&gt;This philosophical shift is the cornerstone of a landmark report, released last month by the Commonwealth's Transportation Finance Commission, which was tasked with finding the estimated $15 billion to $19 billion needed to fix the state's crumbling roads and bridges over the next two decades.&lt;br /&gt;Under the commission's plan, a 5-cents-per-mile fee on major roads would replace, or minimize, gas taxes and fundamentally change a central aspect of everyday life.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/20434</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/20434</link>
<title>Curbing gridlock : peak-period fees to relieve traffic congestion / Committee for Study on Urban Transportation Congestion Pricing, Transportation Research Board, [and] Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.</title>
<description>&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Committee for Study on Urban Transportation Congestion Pricing. . &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline"&gt;Curbing gridlock : peak-period fees to relieve traffic congestion / Committee for Study on Urban Transportation Congestion Pricing, Transportation Research Board, [and] Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.&lt;/span&gt; [0309055040 (v. 1) ] Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, c1994.  &lt;br /&gt;Call#: Van Pelt Library HE336.C66 N37 1994&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20430</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20430</link>
<title>M.T.A. Says Mayor's Plan to Ease Traffic Will Cost $767 Million to Accomplish - New York Times</title>
<description>October 8, 2007&lt;br /&gt;M.T.A. Says Mayor's Plan to Ease Traffic Will Cost $767 Million to Accomplish&lt;br /&gt;By ROBERT D. McFADDEN&lt;p&gt;Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's plan to ease traffic congestion by charging motorists who drive into the busiest parts of Manhattan would cost hundreds of millions of dollars for new bus and subway services and mass transit improvements to accommodate tens of thousands of new riders, transportation officials say.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, in a report to a commission created to evaluate the mayor's plan, estimated that expanded transit service and capital improvements for city and suburban riders who would give up their cars to get into Manhattan over the next five years would cost $767 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The total, the authority said, comprised $284 million in 2008 and 2009 for 367 new city and suburban buses, 46 new subway cars and many station renovations and service enhancements; $163 million for other subway and bus improvements from 2010 to 2012, and $320 million for two new bus terminals in Queens and Staten Island.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20429</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20429</link>
<title>Tollbooths and Traffic: The Talk of 86th Street - New York Times</title>
<description>October 7, 2007&lt;br /&gt;Dispatches&lt;br /&gt;Tollbooths and Traffic: The Talk of 86th Street&lt;br /&gt;By JAKE MOONEY&lt;p&gt;ANYONE who spends much time in the vicinity of East 86th Street, on the Upper East Side, is well acquainted with congestion. The street is one of the main two-way routes between the East River and Central Park, and on any given day it is home to a glut of vendors' tables and vans, to city buses, to delivery trucks, to commuters rushing to and from the subway past gaudy store displays - and to residents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For all these people, it might seem that a sweeping plan to tame the traffic, like the mayor's congestion pricing plan currently being discussed by the state's New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission, would be a hit. But on this particular street, the plan has been a tough sell. The street represents the northern boundary of the zone that drivers would have to pay to enter during business hours on weekdays, and some people in the area fear that the fees will make life in the border zone even more chaotic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Elaine Walsh, president of the East 86th Street Merchants and Residents Association, has a list of questions: Will residents who park in the area and drive to work outside the zone have to pay to leave? What about people who pass in and out of the zone while looking for parking spots? Will businesses just inside the line suffer?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20400</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20400</link>
<title>STATE ROUTE 91 VALUE-PRICED EXPRESS LANES: UPDATED OBSERVATIONS</title>
<description>Sullivan, Edward&lt;br /&gt;State Route 91 Value-Priced Express Lanes: Updated Observations&lt;br /&gt;Transportation Research Record&lt;br /&gt;Issue	Volume 1812 / 2002&lt;br /&gt;DOI	10.3141/1812-05&lt;br /&gt;Pages	37-42&lt;br /&gt;Abstract:	Recently over 5 years of field observations were concluded of the value-priced express lanes that opened December 27, 1995, in the median of State Route 91, in Orange County, California. Data collection, covering about a year and a half of observations to establish baseline conditions before opening day, included traffic measurements, vehicle occupancy counts, transit ridership, and comprehensive travel surveys of current and former commuters. The corresponding data analysis included the calibration of choice models of route, occupancy, transponder acquisition, and time-of-day behavior of commuters and the estimation of air pollution emissions. Findings are presented on traffic trends, toll lane use, travelers' responses to changing congestion and tolls, shifts in ridesharing and transit use, shifts in trip purpose, differences associated with income and other demographics, public opinion, collision experience, and the results of choice and emissions modeling. As the first practical application of value pricing in the United States, the State Route 91 express lanes provide many important insights, both technical and institutional, some of which are relevant to the implementation of value-pricing projects in other locations.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20389</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20389</link>
<title>JSTOR: Economica: New Series, Vol. 44, No. 175, pp. 297-304</title>
<description>The Distributional Effects of Congestion Taxes&lt;br /&gt;Richard Layard &lt;br /&gt;Economica, New Series, Vol. 44, No. 175. (Aug., 1977), pp. 297-304. &lt;p&gt;Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0427%28197708%292%3A44%3A175%3C297%3ATDEOCT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20388</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20388</link>
<title>Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth</title>
<description>&lt;div class="citation"&gt;                                      &lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;Title: Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth&lt;/div&gt;          &lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;         Source:                               Transportation                                           [0049-4488]                                           Santos                                           yr:2004                                           vol:31                                           iss:1                                           pg:21&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="LabelBold"&gt;&lt;a name="Abs1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;This paper shows that road pricing can be regressive, progressive or neutral, and refutes the generalised idea that road pricing is always regressive. The potential distributional impacts of a road pricing scheme are assessed in three English towns. It is found that impacts are town specific and depend on where people live, where people work and what mode of transport they use to go to work. Initial impacts may be progressive even before any compensation scheme for losers is taken into account. When the situation before the scheme is implemented is such that majority of drivers entering the area where the scheme would operate come from households with incomes above the average, it can be expected that, once the scheme is implemented, these drivers coming from rich households will continue to cross the cordon and will be prepared to pay the charge. In such a case the overall effect will be that on average, rich people will pay the toll and poor people will not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;                     &lt;/div&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20387</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20387</link>
<title>Congestion Pricing with Heterogeneous Travelers: A General-Equilibrium Welfare Analysis</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Journal Title  - Networks and Spatial Economics&lt;br /&gt;Article Title  - Congestion Pricing with Heterogeneous Travelers: A General-Equilibrium Welfare Analysis&lt;br /&gt;    Volume  - Volume 4&lt;br /&gt;    Issue  - 2&lt;br /&gt;    First Page  - 135&lt;br /&gt;    Last Page  - 160&lt;br /&gt;    Issue Cover Date  - 2004-06-01&lt;br /&gt;    Author  - Andr&amp;eacute; de Palma&lt;br /&gt;    Author  - Robin LindseyDOI  - 10.1023/B:NETS.0000027770.27906.82&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link  - http://www.springerlink.com/content/t317779845j42x04&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="Abs1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Traffic congestion pricing is studied using a general-equilibrium framework that incorporates public goods expenditures, an income tax, a government budget constraint, and preferences for equity. Individuals differ with respect to wages, values of travel time, and the congestion characteristics of their vehicles. Formulae for optimal tolls are derived and decomposed to reveal the separate influences of individual and vehicle heterogeneity, road network effects, fiscal effects and equity concerns. Using an example various tolling regimes are considered, defined by how much of the network is tolled, by whether and how tolls are differentiated by route, and by vehicle and individual characteristics. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20314</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20314</link>
<title>Electronic road pricing: developments in Hong Kong 1983b</title></item></channel></rss>
