http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/evaluation PennTags Feed http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20269 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/20269 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/11566 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/11566 Many financial education providers still do not have a basic level of evaluation capacity and are unable to identify program outcomes and design effective evaluation instruments. It is difficult to propose a national evaluation strategy without a basic understanding of current evaluation capacity and of the critical gaps in program evaluation. In addition, there has been little discussion about the challenges facing financial professionals and educators who are on the &ldquo;front lines&rdquo; delivering and evaluating programs. The purpose of this survey article is to address these critical gaps in the literature and to provide an overview of the current state of financial education and program evaluation. Using qualitative and quantitative data collected from financial professionals and educators nationwide, this study provides insight into what can be done to build national evaluation capacity and conduct more effective program evaluations. http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/10170 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/10170 Please let me know how you liked (or didn't like!) the class!<br /> http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3877 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3877 The Credibility Commons is an experimental environment enabling individuals the opportunity to try out different approaches to improving access to credible information on the World Wide Web. Tools will be provided to researchers as well as the public, allowing them to try out search strategies, collections and other approaches to improving access to credible information. The Commons can be viewed as a collaborative space in which to share ideas, data sets, results and innovations. This project is sponsored by the MacArthur Foundation who is deeply invested in improving access to credible information on the World Wide Web. http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3419 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3419 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3144 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3144 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3131 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3131 changes to peer review?<br /> http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3129 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/3129 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2996 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2996 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2827 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2827 Communications of the ACM article.&nbsp;<!--StartFragment -->&nbsp;<font size="2">&nbsp;</font><a href="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101779.1101802">http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101779.1101802</a> <br /> http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2821 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2821 Article about the inadvertent repetition of research<br /> http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2823 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/2823 <!--StartFragment --><a title="Nature article" href="http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1038/438900a">http://dx.doi.org/&nbsp;<span class="blacksml">10.1038/438900a</span></a> http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/647 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/647 October 2005 article...&quot;subject experts were asked for opinions about sections of the popular online, open access encyclopedia Wikipedia, in the wake of &quot;the founder of the online encyclopedia ... admitt[ing] some of its entries are 'a horrific embarrassment.'&quot; Includes ratings and comments on specific entries. From the Guardian Unlimited, the online companion to the British newspaper The Guardian.&quot;&nbsp; found through LII<br />