<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/hollywood+american_history</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/hollywood+american_history</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/4150</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/4150</link>
<title>America on film : Hollywood and American history / Kenneth M. Cameron.</title>
<description>&lt;div&gt;Cameron, Kenneth M., 1931-. America on film : Hollywood and American history / Kenneth M. Cameron. [0826410332 (hardcover : alk. paper)] New York : Continuum, 1997. &lt;br /&gt;Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1995.9.H5 C36 1997&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this book Kenneth Cameron goes through the 20&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; century, attempting to create an appropriate historical and cultural context for the film produced in each decade.&amp;nbsp; Of particular interest in the chapter entitlted &amp;ldquo;1940-49: Good War, New World.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Cameron claims that despite war, the forties produced a wide variety of films that were difficult to analyze.&amp;nbsp; Some generalizations he was able to draw were between films made before 1942 and those after 1946.&amp;nbsp; Particularly, the movies made after 1946 and the end of the war tended to be more forward-looking and socially contemplative.&amp;nbsp; Cameron sites &lt;em&gt;The Beginning or the End? &lt;/em&gt;as a film that confonts the moral issues of the day, particularly the decision to drop the atomic bomb and its implications.&amp;nbsp; He also praises &lt;em&gt;Pride of the Marines&lt;/em&gt; for counterring the prevailing attitude of portraying war as glorious.&amp;nbsp; Though limited by the Production Code, it attempted to reveal the harsh realities of war, in addition to difficult subject of a returning veteran who suffered an injury that made him blind.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though &lt;em&gt;The Best Years of Our Lives&lt;/em&gt; is never explicitly mentioned in the chapter, one can easily see how it fits into Cameron&amp;rsquo;s perception of what films were trying to do after the war.&amp;nbsp; Rather than a nostalgic and glorious rendition of the return of war heroes, it examines the lives of three more or less ordinary men, who in their diverstity represent the socio-economic and age spectrum.&amp;nbsp; The film concerns itself not with their heroes&amp;rsquo; reception, but with the difficulties and harsh realities to adjusting to life at home, accompanied by alcoholism, adultery, ostracism, and alienation.&amp;nbsp; It is also a socially conscious film, containing cultural critique and commentary in its exploration of questions such, should we have dropped the bomb?, or, did we really fight the good war?&amp;nbsp; Though patriotic in nature, the film does not shy away from interjecting the varying ideas of Americans regarding the war.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
