<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/politeness+netiquette</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/politeness+netiquette</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/1219</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/1219</link>
<title>Constructions of and negotiations on interaction norms and gender on electronic discussion lists in Norway - Janne Bromseth</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;PDF/text available&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this article, Bromseth discusses his research into 2 Norwegian email lists: Radical Forum (a socialist/Marxist forum) and The Doctor's List (a forum for general practitioners) in which the membership was divided approximately 85% men and 15% women.&amp;nbsp; While the political group tended towards confrontational discussion and raw polemic, the medical forum was characterized by face-saving strategies and an emphasis on &amp;quot;brotherhood&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; Bromseth argues that the latter behavior should not be seen as &amp;quot;feminization&amp;quot; of male speech, but rather as an example of positive and definitively male social practices in&amp;nbsp;modern (2001)&amp;nbsp;Norway.&amp;nbsp; To him, gender is constantly being constructed in relation to other social phenomena and contexts must always be examined independently to show such construction without stereotyping behavior.&amp;nbsp; This argument runs in counter to the generally accepted thoughts towards men's speech and should definitely be considered as a reminder to readers to not make generalized assumptions based upon previous theories, but instead, to take into account mitigating cultural and social factors when analyzing any speech community.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
