<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/warner+michael</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/warner+michael</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/4629</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/4629</link>
<title>Casablanca man : the cinema of Michael Curtiz / James C. Robertson.</title>
<description>&lt;div&gt;Robertson, James C. (James Crighton), 1930-. Casablanca man : the cinema of Michael Curtiz / James C. Robertson. [0415068045] London ; New York : Routledge, 1993. &lt;br /&gt;Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1998.3.C87 R63 1993&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;This book distinguishes itself by giving a through biography of Casablanca&amp;rsquo;s often forgotten director, Michael Curtiz.&amp;nbsp; Usually considered to be nothing more than a studio workhorse, Curtiz and his work have often been ignored as merely the cookie cutter products of the enormous studio factories.&amp;nbsp; In the &lt;u&gt;Casablanca Man&lt;/u&gt;, Robertson tries to rebuff this image of Curtiz and investigate the unique elements of Curtiz&amp;rsquo;s work.&amp;nbsp; During this investigation, Robertson outlines Curtiz&amp;rsquo;s life-story and the influence that it had on his films.&amp;nbsp; Robertson also attempts to discover the man behind Curtiz&amp;rsquo;s films by researching the director&amp;rsquo;s view of film auteurism.&amp;nbsp; In 1917, Curtiz stated that the director&amp;rsquo;s place in a film could be described as a kind of supreme behind the scenes coordinator.&amp;nbsp; Throughout his life, Curtiz favored a hidden approach regarding the influence he had on his own films.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, this method has led critics and viewers alike to forget his existence or see his many successful films as merely happy studio systems accidents.&amp;nbsp; This book is highly relevant to the analysis of Casablanca because it reminds its audience to not forget the work of a director who seems to have put a great deal of effort into being forgotten.&amp;nbsp; Curtiz&amp;rsquo;s influence on Casablanca is significant and (as this book reminds us) should not be forgotten.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
