subscribe to this page
Holcomb, Mark. “To Kill a Mockingbird.” Film Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 4. (Summer, 2002), pp. 34-40. 31 Mar. 2006. <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0015-1386%28200222%2955%3A4%3C34%3ATKAM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G>
The author of this article believes that the film adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird has had a more resonant impact than has the written work. One of the best films of all time, To Kill a Mockingbird possesses the very strong character of Atticus Finch, about whom numerous law school courses are based. The author then discusses the strong mood and atmosphere portrayed in the film, which seems even more personal than the book at times. The author feels the real strength does lie in the film’s exploration of societal themes and racism.
However, he feels that the film does little to change any actual race problems, and characters seem to follow class distinctions only when necessary at times. He indicates other deficiencies as well. The movie does not answer many questions, such as what becomes of the fatherless Ewell children, no longer with any support. The film also does little to explore racism, considering the black community has little to no voice outside of Tom Robinson and the maid, and even they exist in isolation. The black characters are one dimensional stereotypes, doing little to resolve the problem of race. Moreover, though film viewers act as a jury during the trial scenes, their judgment matters little considering the outcome has been predetermined. While the author does believe the film to be well made, it is far too simple to provide a true education in morals and make any significant change in society.
Powell, Burnele. “A Reaction: ‘Stand up, Your Father [A Lawyer] Is Passing.’” Michigan Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, 1999 Survey of Books Related to the Law. (May, 1999), pp. 1373-1375. 31 Mar. 2006. <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-2234%28199905%2997%3A6%3C1373%3AAR%22UYF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9>
The author of this article is in accord with the controversial piece by Professor Lubet. This author questions whether Atticus Finch remains an inspiration for lawyers if Tom Robinson did in fact commit the crime. He then compares the job of a lawyer to that of an actor; lawyers simply fulfill their duty, and an important duty to society at that. As a society, we ask lawyers to distance themselves from their own personal morals so that they can operate to their best ability in the courtroom. Another view is that they feel to have a “social pass” which allows them to act as necessary in the courtroom. He says that the final view expressed by Lubet is the most satisfying, in which a good person or good lawyer is still good even when arguing in the interests of a bad person. The advancement of principles is an act of heroism for the client, the system, and society.
The author indicates that the various defense techniques and tactics used by Atticus do have a place in the judicial system, but boundaries must be maintained, as Atticus does. The author argues that if we accept that Atticus can recognize the biases that exist in his society, his heroism cannot be diminished based on the innocence of his client; we honor him not based on his freeing an innocent man (which he did not), but rather using all methods within the boundaries of the law to win the case for his client on the behalf of society.
Simon, William. “Moral Icons: A Comment on Steven Lubet's ‘Reconstructing Atticus Finch.’” Michigan Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, 1999 Survey of Books Related to the Law. (May, 1999), pp. 1376-1377. 31 Mar. 2006. <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-2234%28199905%2997%3A6%3C1376%3AMIACOS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z>
The author argues that Atticus Finch is respected not only by the bar for his conduct during the trial, but by readers in general because they feel that he really did believe in the truth of his client. The author disagrees with the controversial Lubet article in certain regards. Firstly, he feels that unless Atticus knows for certain that Mayella tells the truth, his cross-examination simply tests the credibility of her character. Likewise, if he knows that she is lying, then he must expose her. Though his tactics might seem questionable, the stakes are quite high; considering the social landscape in Alabama, a black man’s life is certainly at stake.
Another point on which this author disagrees with Lubet is the use of stereotypes. Atticus is depicted as purely virtuous until the end, at which point he begins to show flaws; Lubet does not like this. However, as this author points out, if Atticus were perfect, then the novel would be romantic escapist fiction, not a more believable and impacting ambitious novel. Atticus’s character becomes more complex and does not act purely on virtue when he gives in to the sheriff’s demand regarding his son, Jem, and the murder of Bob Ewell in self defense. At this point, Atticus’s character becomes more believable in its imperfection, and consequently has a great impact on readers.
Stone, Randolph. “Atticus Finch, in Context.” Michigan Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, 1999 Survey of Books Related to the Law. (May, 1999), pp. 1378-1381. 31 Mar. 2006. <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-2234%28199905%2997%3A6%3C1378%3AAFIC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6>
The author of this article takes offense to an argument written by Professor Lubet, who questions whether Atticus Finch is indeed a paragon of lawyers considering the possibility of Tom Robinson’s guilt. He points out that Robinson’s argument does not hinge on consent, because that would never work in 1930s Alabama, and therefore no sexual contact of any kind occurred. He compares the situation to that of Emmit Till, a boy who was murdered in 1955 for whistling at a white woman. Obviously, a consent argument would never pass.
He goes on to assert that Atticus’s cross examination of Mayella was not torture of any kind, and he treated her with respect; considering her status in the community, the communities respect for her could not fall any lower. The prosecution, on the other hand, treated Tom Robinson cruelly and with racist overtones.
The evidence that Tom Robinson committed the crime is very weak. Lubet feels that Atticus does not care about the truth, but only the victory; unlike Lubet, this author asserts that Atticus does believe Tom Robinson, or else he would have sought a plea bargain considering the high chance of failure with an all white jury. Regarding Lubet’s argument about Atticus’s tactics, this author brings up the themes of stereotypes and racism versus sexism. The author feels that racism is a much bigger issue, and Atticus Finch was far ahead of his time in his attitude.
Call#: Van Pelt Library KF384.Z9 L83 2001
Lubet, Steven. Nothing but the Truth. Chapter Six: Atticus Finch, pp 161-180. New York: New York University Press, 2001.
This controversial article considers Atticus Finch, one of the paragons of the law profession. It details his positive character attributes and effect on his society. However, the author also considers the chance that perhaps Atticus may not be as truly good as every reader believes him to be. In the book, although he may seem to be a noble defender of the unrepresented, a chance exists that he simply fulfills his role as a lawyer. He uses whatever means necessary for a successful defense. If this is the case, it isn’t as certain whether Atticus should be considered an icon for the law community, at least in regards to being a defender against racism. People may respect him for his ability to conduct his case in the courtroom, but perhaps not for his selfless defense of the minority. In fact, the author considers the possibility that Atticus defends a guilty man. The book is told from the perspective of Scout, and of course she has a bias. She paints Atticus as noble and perfect, Tom as pure and innocent, and Mayella as dirty and conniving. However, no proof truly indicates that her story is false and Tom’s is true; Tom has the ability to commit the crime and therefore he may be guilty. If Atticus knowingly defends a guilty man, should he still be considered such an icon in the law community? He used all methods necessary to disgrace the alleged rape victim and lower her credibility in order to win the case. However, the article indicates that more likely Atticus does not care whether Tom is guilty or innocent; Atticus is appointed this case, and he will carry it out with his best effort. The ultimate question is whether he should still be considered as much an icon for defender of a black man versus expert lawyer who knows how to win a jury and the case.
Nelson, Cary. “The Depression in the U.S. – An Overview.” Modern American Poetry. 2002. 31 Mar. 2006. <http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/depression/overview.htm>
This article provides an overview of the Great Depression, in which To Kill a Mockingbird is set. It explains the stock market collapse, the loss of jobs, and the especially devastating impact on the farming community, whose income dropped by at least 50%. As the Ewells and Cunninghams were farmers, they have very limited resources, and this contributes to their status in society. Money is quite scarce during this time and most people find themselves out of work. Atticus, though he claims to be poor, is far more fortunate than many others in Maycomb, Alabama.
The article describes the incredibly high unemployment and the subsequent shortage of food, with millions of Americans scrounging to survive. Numerous organizations were initiated by the New Deal, which helped to employ many workers. However, this specific area in Alabama may not have benefited from such programs, at least at this time. Though the Dust Bowl mainly affected Arkansas, Texas, Missouri, and Oklahoma, similar effects were most likely experienced in Alabama as well. The government used the Agricultural Adjustment Act, or AAA, in an effort to aid the farmers and raise their income. The government also used other programs, like the National Recovery Administration, to improve conditions. However, these were bleak times, and many Americans struggled to survive. The South, in which the quality of life was already lower, was especially devastated.