avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags

Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13(5), 375-385.

Lori D. Wolin and Pradeep Korgaonkar, (2003).

This article explores the differences between male and female internet advertising beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors.  The authors hypothesized that males would have in general more positive beliefs about internet advertising, stronger positive attitudes about internet advertising, and more internet consumption behavior.  A survey was conducted with 420 respondents.  Six dimensions of belief were tested: enjoyability, offensiveness, informative, deceptiveness, annoyingness, and usefulness.  Regarding attitudes, respondents were asked how good or bad they found internet advertising, how much they liked it, and how essential it was in general and to them.  Behavior was measured by whether respondents had purchased something over the internet in the past year, and how often they visited 22 different websites.  Results mostly supported the hypotheses.  In particular, men held more positive beliefs about internet advertising, and had slightly stronger positive feelings about internet advertising.  Interestingly, these positive beliefs and attitudes converted into behavior as well.  Men reported more frequent internet purchases.

Wolin and Korgaonkar's study provides specific information on the effect the consumer characteristics of gender have on attitudes about internet advertising.  It indicates that, while other articles assume the ineffectiveness of internet advertising because of low click-through rates, some groups, particularly males, may not feel as negatively about internet ads as would be expected.  Other studies, such as the one reported in "Report: Most Men (18-34) Don't Mind Online Ads" (Brandweek, 49(44), 8; not included in this project), have found similar trends.  Wolin and Korgaonkar's study also reveals an unusual trend: females tend to have more negative attitudes and beliefs about internet ads and, as predicted, less purchase behavior on the internet, but reportedly prefer shopping sites more then men.  Wolin and Korgaonkar note that belief, attitude, and behavior do not necessarily have the hierarchical, causal relationship often expected, as this is an example of.  Rather, one or two of the dimensions may align with each other while another may be completely opposite.  Lastly, this article also details ways that advertising may be better targeted to the respective genders.  Particularly they should target women through ads in traditional media and offering tangible rewards when utilizing the internet.

Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1143–1148

Chingning Wang, Ping Zhang, Risook Choi, and Michael D'Eredita (2002).

Wang et al. go beyond the familiar assertion that consumers ignore and devalue advertising, regardless of the medium, by considering the active nature of consumers according to the Uses and Gratifications model.  They particularly emphasize the interactivity of some advertisements.  These ads allow consumers to actively process, evaluate, and utilize the information provided, and are hypothesized to be the object of more positive attitudes from consumers.  Wang et al. note that the internet is an especially good medium for these interactive ads.  They also consider the motives consumers have when using a particular kind of media as a factor in determining attitude.  Advertising which is particularly interactive, allowing consumers' high levels of control and which meets the informational needs that are consumers' motives for utilizing internet sources elicits an increased perception of value from consumers.  The authors conducted a survey with students and staff from a northeastern college in which twelve different types of advertising types were presented and attitudinal responses were elicited.

This article is particularly useful to a study of consumer attitudes toward internet advertising because it provides an account of situations in which internet advertising can be especially effective.  It serves in part to balance other sources which find consumer attitudes to be more negative.  However, it is quite limited in its explanation of its methods and results.  It is also limited in its results themselves, in that the description of internet advertising which can be safely considered effective is fairly narrow--limited to directional marketing--though it does outline some attributes which, if incorporated, could be helpful to other types of advertising as well.  The article also includes a list of both advertisement and consumer characteristics which influence attitude, including entertainment, informativeness, credibility, demographic considerations, level of irritation evoked by advertisements, and interactivity.  Entertainment, interactivity, and irritation are three factors which repeatedly appear in advertising literature.  While Wang et al. theorize that the informational content of ads may be particularly effective, other studies find that entertainment value is of more importance.

Journal of advertising [0091-3367] 33(4), 89-97.  2004.
Chang-Hoan Cho and Hongsik John Cheon

This article examines the causes behind the widespread ad advoidance which other researchers like Dreze and Hussherr document.  Cho and Cheon posit three reasons for negative attitudes toward internet ads: perceived ad clutter, negative experiences with internet advertising leading to beliefs that it is not useful or valuable to the consumer, and perceived goal impediment.  266 college students from a large southeastern university completed a self-administered survey which measured the constructs in the hypothesis, as well as ad avoidance.  Ad clutter was measured by questions related to the excessiveness of, exclusiveness of, and irritation caused by ads.  Perceived goal impediment was measured through search hindrance, distraction, and disruption caused by the ads, and negative experiences was measured through dissatisfaction with ads, perceived lack of utility, and perceived lack of incentive attached to attention to ads.  The results of their study support their hypotheses and show that attitudes which lead to ad avoidance behavior are influenced by these three components.  However, the study is limited in that while it shows that these three things likely lead to ad avoidance, the narrow scope of the study prevents them from discovering any further causes, even causes which may have much larger effects than those hypothesized and studied.

This article is one of the most relevant to a study of attitudes toward internet advertising because it clearly identifies a few underlying issues which lead to these attitudes.  It goes beyond the question of whether ads are effective and investigates when and why they are or are not effective.  One of the most interesting parts of the article is the portion dealing with perceived goal impediment.  While Wang et al. theorize that the internet could be a particularly good place for advertisers because of its interactivity, Cho and Cheon disagree, citing the internet's particular goal-oriented components in contrast with TV and radio's more entertainment-oriented natures.  Advertising may actually be less effective on the internet because of the characteristics of these consumers: more active and less patient when advertising distracts or disrupts them.  It also provides a contrast to Dreze and Hussherr, who look at advertising's effectiveness despite ad avoidance by utilizing preattentive processing.  Cho and Cheon provide information and strategies for advertisers who are discontent with mere preattentive processing and want to recapture audience's attentions, particularly decreasing ad clutter and misleading banner messages.