avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


related to cartoon+wwii
1 + america
1 + animation
2 + disney
1 + mickey
1 + mouse
2 + propaganda
1 + studio
1 + walt
view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags
The author says that his book is “a more detailed look at a special time of crisis for both the studio and America. This study, then, is a record of the Disney Studio during World War II, an attempt to explain why and how the films of this period were made.” Shale discusses the “process of animation, the historical development of the animated film, and the major contributions and achievements of the Disney studio in this field.” He also talks about government films and “how Disney acquired his first military contracts and how the studio departments adjusted to the shift from entertainment values to teaching values.” The author also focuses on a few films made by Disney including Victory Through Air Power, The Gremlins, and The Three Caballeros. In the end, he investigates the character of Donald Duck who he claims “was known worldwide, and his fighting spirit made him more than appropriate as a symbol of America’s role in global affairs.”
    This source provides a significant amount of information regarding the history of how the Disney Company became involved with World War II propaganda films. It is essential to look at these facts carefully to provide a context for my thesis. Also, this book is important because it provides specific examples of propaganda cartoons made by the Disney Company. By examining these films closely, one can see how audiences may have been affected.  


This book shows how Mickey Mouse’s character affected America. Disney himself is said to have “perceived Mickey as a powerful and important symbol in American culture.” He had previously been used to help “people escape from their Depression anxieties.” This is one reason why Disney films were popular, but this source investigates why Disney cartoons were so well liked and finds that “Disney combined the myth-making medium of film with his perception of American popular taste.” The author claims “Mickey’s creation of a fantasy world is an accurate reflection of the cultural mood in 1944. After three years of war, Americans were tired of propaganda, and beyond ‘those glorious days of 1942, when audiences cheered the American flag on the screen.’” Uelmen goes on to explain that the Disney studio offered an escape to the war by providing audiences with a fantasy world. Disney “played an important role in projecting images of wartime unity.” Unity was defined as the civilian war effort and “how Mickey perceives cultural difference in America is a reflection of both the wartime consolidation of public opinion and Disney’s unique way of seeing the culture.” For example, Minnie says that in San Francisco the sun sets in the perfect place, but in Chinatown she says that she cannot read any of the signs in stores. Disney may “have been making a subtle reference to the power of Western resources to defeat the ‘Asian monster.’
    This source is very useful as it answers both parts of my thesis suggesting that Mickey Mouse’s character allowed Disney propaganda films to be successful. Uelmen discusses the background of Mickey Mouse and shows that his character was a precedent for why Disney cartoons were effective. Mickey’s character was used to help people deal with the Depression, so Americans were able to bond with his character. Therefore, they would be more inclined to trust and agree with the ideas presented in Disney cartoons later on even if the beliefs were pro-war.