avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags
Alfred Hitchcocks "Rebecca" is an iconic Gothic romance adapted from Daphne DuMauriers famous novel, and was successful enough with contemporary audiences to win Best Picture in 1940. Constructed through Hitchcocks calculated, deliberate technique, the haunting absence of Rebecca serves as a focal point of mystery and desire in the film, subtly exploring the societal and sexual role of women and questioning the ideal definition of femininity.

Wheatley, Kim.  “Gender Politics and the Gothic in Alfred Hitchcock’s ‘Rebecca.’”  Gothic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Nov., 2002), pp. 133-145.

Rebecca represents a new strain of Gothic romance in which the tortured heroine falls in love with a man who plays a dual role in regard to the heroine: he not only offers her relief from danger, but is also a major source of unresolved tension and confusion for her.  Not only does Mr. deWinter play a pivotal role, then, but Manderley itself is undeniably a significant “character.”  Furthermore, Rebecca is made all the more powerful by her very absence.  Through haunting music, symbolism attached to her material possessions, and details such as the camera angle in the boathouse confession scene, Rebecca’s ghostly presence is solidified. 


Even greater emphasis on Rebecca’s omnipresence emerges through the apparent continued loyalty of Jasper the dog, and also through Mrs. Danvers’ unwavering devotion to Rebecca and subsequent disdain for the young wife.  Mrs. Danvers even goes so far as to articulate her musings as to whether the dead continue to observe and dwell among the living.  This voyeuristic pervasion of the plot lends Rebecca an ominous, haunting power and lingering influence. 


However, Wheatley presents the alternative ‘containment thesis’ that Rebecca’s relative power and influence is held at bay and even diminishes over the course of the film.  Her containment is achieved through Maxim’s patriarchal authority, most poignantly evident in his young wife’s reaction during the confession scene, during which she is completely vulnerable and it is revealed that all she desires is his love, relinquishing all hints of independence.  This disproportionate male power held by Maxim is echoed in two other prominent male characters, Frank Crawley and Jack Favell, who provide counterpoints to Maxim’s harsh personality yet exercise similar control over the young heroine.  Even further establishing the trend of patriarchy, only men are present during one of the final scenes of the film, in Dr. Baker’s office, defining negotiations and relationships between men of the utmost importance.  Thus, despite Rebecca’s haunting influence over the course of the film, Wheatley suggests that it is ultimately patriarchy which triumphs in the end.

Tay, Sharon Lin.  “Constructing a Feminist Cinematic Ideology: The Gothic Woman’s Film Beyond Psychoanalysis.”  Women, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Winter, 2003), pp. 263-280.

Distinctive historical and social factors provided for the emergence of the Gothic woman’s film in Hollywood during the 1940’s.  The Second World War elicited an upheaval in the American social hierarchy, necessitating that women enter the work force and thus empowering them to an unprecedented degree.  Also, the movie-going audience changed, with a larger proportion of females in the audience than men, since the majority of them were abroad fighting.  Finally, the cinema adjusted to address this new predominantly feminine audience, introducing female protagonists and feminine plotlines.  Heterosexual marital fulfillment often remained the ultimate goal in these films, with the rejection or failure to comply with this societal standard usually resulting in the heroine’s madness or death. 


When comparing Gothic films from the early 1940’s with those made later in the decade, the heroines of the earlier films harbor unwarranted suspicions of their husbands, while in the later films another male character is introduced who is thoroughly benevolent and succeeds in rescuing the heroine.  Still, the Gothic woman’s film differs from the conventional films preceding it because, for the first time, the heroine puts up some degree of resistance to compliance with traditional societal demands.  Indeed, the primary focus shifts from purely romance to violence and mystery, qualities shared with other genres such as film noir and horror.  This transgression by the plotline and the heroine of conventional expectations destabilizes and exposes gaps in the normative cinema structure, and the ambiguity created by this uncertainty is the source of suspense. 


Epitomizing the transgression beyond traditional boundaries is Rebecca, who represents the exact opposite of the young wife’s demure, conventional femininity.  Symbolized by the turbulent, crashing waves of the sea, Rebecca’s uncontrollable, unpredictable power creates a constant source of tension and disruption throughout the film.  Whenever the possibility of calm or resolution arises, a monogrammed belonging of Rebecca’s may appear, thrusting the plot back into uncertainty and chaos.  This atmosphere of paranoia and fear is highly characteristic of the Gothic woman’s film, and the transgression of traditionally feminine societal norms formed a basis for the eventual development of the feminist movement.

Kaplan, E. Ann. "Is the Gaze Male?" Feminism in Film. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. Oxford/New York: Oxford UP, 2000. 119-138.
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1995.9.W6 F448 2000
 
Kaplan examines the feminist discourse on the idea of the fetishism of the female form in her article “ Is the Gaze Male?” She finds that while Hollywood would contend that females are able to exist on their own as women, female characters are often approached as enigmas that need to be figured out and thus placed and understood within the context of a patriarchal system. Kaplan cites Laura Mulvey who argues that the fetishism of female film characters exists through three different types of looks. The first look occurs when the woman is filmed, many times by a male director. The look, according to Mulvey, is inherently voyeuristic regardless of the gender of the director but nonetheless serves to eroticize the female form. The second look, which usually occurs within the narrative of the film, depicts women as objects subject to men’s gazes. The third look occurs when the audience takes on the position of both the voyeur of the first look and the character within the narrative of the second look who gazes upon the female. Kaplan goes onto explain that the fetishism of females relates the psychoanalytical issue of fear of castration present in men. By objectifying the female, both the men within the film and the men watching the film are able neutralize the threatening nature of the female that Freud argues plagues the subconscious of all men.

The idea of reducing the threat of a woman through fetishism exists both within the narrative of Spellbound and through the techniques that Hitchcock employed while making the film. The men that surround Dr. Peterson at Green Manors continually remind her of her position as an attractive unmarried female while diminishing the importance of her strengths as a doctor. In the scene when Dr. Peterson returns from her walk with Dr. Edwardes, the men at the doctors’ table look her up and down and repeatedly comment on her appearance. Hitchcock also contributes to the idea of diminishing Dr. Peterson’s strength through his extensive use of still close-ups which forced actress Ingrid Bergman to remain extremely still and limit her movement throughout a large portion of the film. However, it is interesting to note that the gaze is at times reversed and that the male, not the female, is at the receiving end of an objectifying look. In Spellbound this idea is played out through the repeated use of lingering shots of Dr. Edwardes from the female perspective of Dr. Peterson.

Feminism and film / edited by E. Ann Kaplan. [0198782349 (pbk.) ] Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2000.
Call#: Van Pelt Library Rosengarten Reserve PN1995.9.W6 F448 2000 
 
Part One: Pioneers and Classics: The Modernist Mode Introductory Notes Claire Johnston: Woman's Cinema as Counter-Cinema Laura Mulvey: Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema Elizabeth Cowie: Woman as Sign Christine Gledhill: Klute: A Contemporary Film Noir and Feminist Criticism Mary Ann Doane: Woman's Stake: Filming the Female Body Kaja Silverman: Male Subjectivity and Celestial Satire: It's a Wonderful Life E. Ann Kaplan: Is the Gaze Male? Claire Johnston: Dorothy Arzner: Critical Strategies
 
Part Two: Critiques of Phase One Theories: New Methods Introductory Notes Judith Mayne: Lesbian Looks: Dorothy Arzner and Female Authorship David N. Rodowick: The Difficulty of Difference Miriam Hansen: Pleasure, Ambivalence, Identification: Valentino and Female Spectatorship Steve Neale: Masculinity as Spectacle Teresa de Lauretis: Strategies of Coherence: Narrative, Cinema, Feminist Poetics, Yvonne Rainer Joan Copjec: The Delirium of Clinical Perfection
 
Part Three: Race, Sexuality, and Postmodernism Introductory Notes Trinh T. Minh-ha and Nancy Chen: Speaking Nearby Jane Gaines: White Privilege and Looking Relations: Race and Gender in Feminist Film Theory C. Pajaczkowska, and C. and L. Young: Racism, Representation, and Psychoanalysis Pratibha Parmar: That Moment of Emergence Teresa de Lauretis: Sexual Indifference and Lesbian Representation Part Four: Spectatorship, Ethnicity, and Melodrama Introductory Notes Mary Ann Doane: Film and the Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator Annette Kuhn: Women's Genres Jackie Stacey: Desperately Seeking Difference E. Ann Kaplan: The Case of the Missing Mother: Patriarchy and the Maternal in Vidor's Stella Dallas Linda Williams: 'Something Else Besides a Mother': Stella Dallas and the Maternal Melodrama Ana M. Lopez: Tears and Desire: Women and Melodrama in the 'Old' Mexican Cinema Tania Modleski: Three Men and Baby M Laura Mulvey: The Carapace that Failed: Ousame Sembene's Xala


tagged feminism film psychoanalysis by walther ...and 1 other person ...on 07-DEC-06
"The most important thing to say about Thornham's book is that it is one of the best edited collections of essays this reviewer has seen. Moving in roughly chronological order, Thornham includes selections from all the branches of feminist film criticism and by most of the important scholars in the field. The editor has chosen carefully, and the reader will take pleasure in revisiting the works of Jonhston, Mulvey, Doane, de Lauretis, Kuhn, Gledhill, Staiger, Modleski, hooks, and Butler, among others. Thornham introduces each section with an admirable summary of the historical context of each new movement. This collection will be widely circulated and used in countless classrooms over the coming years, as well it should be. All levels." (Choice, March 2000)
tagged feminism film theory by jarson ...and 1 other person ...on 18-NOV-05

""In imaging female subjectivity and addressing the spectator as female, feminist filmmakers have created films which transform and innovate cinematic codes and conventions." Smelik switches the focus of feminist discourse from spectator to filmmaker. Unwilling to revive the auteur theory, which she considers to be elitist and phallocentric, she nevertheless investigates the works of such filmmakers as Sander, Campion, Treut, and Adlon and discovers ways in which they subvert traditional cinematic subjectivity, affect, and modes of representation. Smelik's arguments are, of course, deeply rooted in the feminist theory of Lacan, Mulvey, Silverman, Kaplan, Irigaray, et al., but she also includes such figures as Eisenstein and Barthes. She does not privilege any particular theory but uses whatever works for the particular filmmaker she is dealing with. Her choice of films is as refreshing as her method: one is too used to reading about the same feminist films in book after book. Smelik's knowledge of the field is encyclopedic, and her analyses are consistently persuasive. This welcome addition to the ongoing feminist discourse is recommended for upper-division undergraduates through faculty." (Choice, February 1999)

tagged feminism film theory women by jarson ...on 18-NOV-05
interviews with Pearl Bowser; Margaret Caples; Michelle Citron; Megan Cunningham; Cheryl Dunye; Vanalyne Green; Barbara Hammer; Kate Horsfield; Carol Leigh; Susan Mogul; Juanita Mohammed; Frances Negrsn-Muntaner; Eve Oishi; Constance Penley; Wendy Quinn; Julia Reichert; Carolee Schneemann; Valerie Soe; Victoria Vesna; and Yvonne Welbon.
tagged feminism film interviews women by jarson ...on 18-NOV-05
Papers presented at a conference held Nov. 1990 at York University and other papers.
tagged feminism film women by jarson ...on 11-NOV-05