This project is about advertising and privacy and whether or not companies should have access to consumer personal information without consent and then personalizing advertisements back to the consumer. It will also look at actual consumer response to advertising and privacy and how actual consumers feel about receiving personalized advertisements.
In this project, I will be examining how online social networks affect identity formation in their members. I am interested in both how people present themselves online and how that virtual persona/world affects their identity formation (for example, the phenomenom of taking a photograph simply because you want it to be your facebook picture). Online relationships/interactions and virtual popularity are also key issues for my project. I will predominantly be focusing on the Website Facebook.com, but for research, I will be looking at pieces that examine social networks, online privacy, virtual/computer mediated relationships, online popularity, and representations of self on the Internet/"virtual personae."
Some helpful Websites for information on Facebook.com and its background:
This first article discusses Facebook's critical success factors and why many of its features appeal to its users.
(http://chimprawk.blogspot.com/2006/05/facebooks-critical-success-factors.html).
This next blog is entitled "Facebook: The Complete Biography," and it is just that. It provides a good overview of the history of Facebook and its corporate culture (http://mashable.com/2006/08/25/facebook-profile/).
And finally, the source of it all: http://www.facebook.com. Check out the blog and the privacy information without signing in.
tagged engl_569 facebook.com identity_formation online_communities privacy social_networks
by rachee
...on 10-MAR-07
Anderson, Janna Quitney, 1955- . Imagining the internet : personalities, predictions, perspectives / Janna Quitney Anderson. [0742539369 (cloth : alk. paper) ] Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield, c2005.
Call#: Van Pelt Library HM851 .A63 2005
Call#: Van Pelt Library HM851 .A63 2005
This book is a sweeping look at the Internet and how it has changed the way that we view the world (a common cliché in Internet scholarship). Where I did find this book interesting though was in its discussion of privacy and the Internet. Also the witty tone of the book (one chapter is entitled “Saddam, O.J., and the Unabomber” and is about the Internet and pop culture) makes it an easy book to get into. The later chapters (starting with Ch. 12) discuss the trade-off between technology/access and privacy. Many people, especially in the older generations who have not grown up with the Internet, still think of the Internet in terms of the “Big Brother” metaphor. There is definitely a trade-off and some of the “Big Brother”-ness of the Internet (and social networks where often very personal information is revealed) is often inevitable. Something this book does not directly discuss is how generational this discomfort is. Younger generations who have grown up with the Internet, instant messenger, and online social networks are far more comfortable with a lack of privacy than older generations.
There is also another type of privacy that deals with the Internet: the privacy of being anonymous and creating an identity online. Chapter 13, “Nobody Knows You’re a Dog (or do they? Privacy issues and the Internet)" uses the image of the dog in front of the computer from the New Yorker cartoon to question how anonymity and privacy have changed. The author argues that maybe it used to be the case that “nobody knows you’re a dog” but now, they not only know you’re a dog, but they also know your favorite food and where you went walking yesterday. Applying the author’s point to social networks, it’s interesting that there is discomfort with a loss of privacy when in many cases, information is provided voluntarily. Of course, when it is appropriated for other uses, discomfort can ensue, but I think that (in many cases at least) with so much of one’s identity based on the Internet, it creates a double edged sword: you have to divulge information in order to create an online persona, but that also makes you vulnerable. I know that I am uncomfortable when Google puts up advertisements that correspond to my Gmail messages; and yet I still love my Gmail. In addition, Facebook.com has many privacy controls and options, but people were still livid when it added the “Live Feed” function. Of course, you could go to options and turn it off, but there erupted multiple groups on the site that were angry at this invasion of privacy. This book, especially the sections on privacy, were interesting in that they opened up more questions about how social networks interact with our lives both on and offline and how privacy or lack thereof can be a motivator for how identity is presented.
belongs to Social Networking Communities Online (e.g. Facebook) project
tagged big_brother identity_formation internet privacy social_networks by rachee ...on 10-MAR-07
tagged big_brother identity_formation internet privacy social_networks by rachee ...on 10-MAR-07
Girl wide web : girls, the Internet, and the negotiation of identity / edited by Sharon R. Mazzarella. [0820471178 (pbk. : alk. paper) ] New York : Peter Lang, c2005.
Call#: Van Pelt Library HQ798 .G525 2005
Call#: Van Pelt Library HQ798 .G525 2005
Looking specifically at the scholarly article entitled, "The Constant Contact Generation: Exploring Teen Friendship Networks Online." By Lynn Schofiend Clark. Pp. 203-221.
This essay examines how teenage girls are using the Internet and online social networks to stay constantly connected to friends and exert power over their social lives, even as they are confined to their parents’ homes. The author cites Giddens’ theory of using new technologies to minimize risk and applies it to how teenage girls use the Internet: They want to bring stability to their social status and peer groups (which is utterly important at that age), and they try to do so by remaining in constant contact. The author interviews teenage girls and attempts to find out, “how young people themselves explain what is important to them about their new media use” (208). What she found was that, as the essay chapter implies, what is important to them is to be always interacting with their peer groups and to get a private space to communicate with friends even within the public space of their home (online is private even when family members are in the same room, as opposed to the telephone). The author also asserts that online networks are a way for teenagers to approach peers and subjects that they might not feel comfortable confronting in person. This is another way in which social networks and online chatting can minimize risk.
Beyond this though, another major function of social networks is to “quantify, measure, and verify one’s popularity with one’s peers” (214). That one is the most problematic to me, as networks become popularity and attractiveness contests – this is definitely seen on facebook.com and MySpace.com. One of the most popular features of these two social networking sites is the ability to upload and tag pictures. In that way, not only can young girls choose pictures that frame their identity in a certain way, but it is also a way to show off what one did the previous weekend and who one’s friends are. Clark discusses the fragility of this age, but does not directly address the physicality that is brought to the forefront in many social networks. However, she does discuss the important element of “control over one’s environment” (216) which expresses itself in the formation of identity and the presentation of an edited/deliberate version of the self. As a side note, there are some other interesting essays in this collection (there are 11 total in this volume) which deal with the gendered nature of Internet interactions and how teenagers take part in fan culture.
belongs to Social Networking Communities Online (e.g. Facebook) project
tagged gender instant_messaging new_media online_popularity privacy social_networks teens virtual_friends by rachee ...and 1 other person ...on 10-MAR-07
tagged gender instant_messaging new_media online_popularity privacy social_networks teens virtual_friends by rachee ...and 1 other person ...on 10-MAR-07



